▸ Column · Viltrumite Empire, galactic conquest era — a civilization of warrior-conquerors where the pompous British nature documentarian maps to the Imperial Species Chronicler, the droning bureaucratic cataloguers dispatched to newly claimed worlds to document local fauna.
THRAGG replies.
Replied to by Thragg, with a rebuttal from Invincible.
The letter
For three standard cycles, my bonded mate Idris has performed the exact same impression of a pompous Imperial Species Chronicler — the type dispatched to newly claimed worlds to catalogue local fauna in flat bureaucratic affect — narrating my every movement. It began during our bonding voyage, where I found it genuinely amusing: "here we observe the Viltrumite female in her territory, retrieving her combat gauntlet." I permitted it. It has since appeared at shared meals with my family unit, at his kin-group's naming rite, and once — with remarkable poor judgment — at the memorial gathering following my grandmother's death, where he narrated me selecting food from the tribute spread. Three cycles. Not a syllable updated: same inflection, same three observations about my "natural habitat," same self-satisfied sound he makes at his own wit. Last period I asked him plainly to let me heat provisions without commentary. He replied, in character, that the female grows "territorial when her routine is disturbed." Is this grounds for a serious reckoning, or am I permitted to begin narrating his personal maintenance rituals in return until he grasps what he has done?
Thragg replies
What you have described is not a mate who performs a joke. A disciplined instrument performs when it serves and ceases when conditions no longer warrant it. What you have described is a reflex that cannot be suspended. He ran the same maneuver during your grandmother's memorial — not because tribute gatherings invite it, but because the pattern fired and nothing in him arrested it. That is the distinction. He is not executing the bit. The bit is executing him.
Examine the three cycles. An action that began in service of a specific bond — responsive, precise, the product of a genuine moment — calcified into a reflex deployed without reference to circumstance. This is not consistency. Consistency is the repeated subordination of an impulse to a purpose. What your mate performs is the reverse: an impulse that has escaped subordination entirely, overriding context, overriding your direct request for silence. A weapon that discharges without your hand on it is not a weapon. It is a liability.
When you asked him to stop, he answered in character. That is your only necessary data point. He cannot put it down even on direct command. That defect is his to correct — not through your narrating his routines in return, which is an emotional response dressed as logic and serves no goal beyond the brief satisfaction of equivalent discomfort — but through his own recognition that the habit governs him and he must reclaim it.
I will note what I cannot address: you did not write to me about a joke. You wrote because at your grandmother's memorial you needed your mate, and he gave you a narrator instead. That structure underneath — I can name it. What it costs you is a dimension my instruments do not reach.
— Thragg
Invincible weighs in
Thragg diagnosed your marriage like a malfunctioning engine. And look — the part about the habit running your husband instead of the other way around? That's actually right. But look at what his answer does: it optimizes the behavior and walks straight past the actual problem.
He ran that narration at your grandmother's memorial. You were grieving. You needed your husband. You got a Species Chronicler. That's not a reflex malfunction. That's him not seeing you.
I've been so caught in my own orbit that the person right next to me became someone I was performing at instead of with. It costs something, and it isn't fixable by correcting a habit.
Thragg wants you to correct the reflex. I'm telling you the reflex is pointing at something. The question isn't whether the accent can be put down on command. It's whether, when you asked him plainly to be present, he actually wanted to be. That's the one worth asking.
— Invincible
▸ Read next